Skip to main content

About your Search

20130801
20130831
Search Results 0 to 23 of about 24 (some duplicates have been removed)
. neil: should he have been on top of the nsa, or is that too much for mark cuban? >> come on neil. >> you are mr. internet star. >> i don't see it as that big a deal, i know -- i get audited almost every year, all my foundations get audited pretty much every year, most of my businesses. neil: both democratic and republican administrations alike. >> i don't feel like a victim, i still have to compete, with nsa it is disappointing there was not transparency up front they were doing this, and we found out about it the way we did. about, bits are bits, if you think your mailbox was protected and they could not find out what they wantedo. there is not a much privacy as people would like to expect, particularly in an era where i would rather be protected. neil: if you want your privacy get over it, is it that bad? >> it is that good. neil: you hear the other instances like hacking or sites shutting down, and instagram, and nazdaq, so many others, washington post, "new york times," amazon, again and again, you see a pattern. >> yeah, you better believe it, every single digital asset we h
don't get you. all right. thank you. and nsa -- this is something, i don't knowhere rick comes out, nsa hits keep oncoming, we found out a court on to nsa abuses and warning them to cool it years ago, i'm talking years ago. to republican congressman to said enough, and moving to slap them down, my mother made the best toffee in the world. it's delicious. so now we've turned her toffee into a business. my goal was to take an idea and make it happen. i'm janet long and i formed my toffee company through legalzoom. never really thought i would make money doing what i love. [ robert ] we created legalzoom to help people start their business and launch their dreams. go to legalzoom.com today and make your business dream a reality. at legalzoom.com we put the law on your side. neil: drip, drip, stop, stop, congressman mike fitzpatrick had enough. congressman, is joining me now. what do you want to do? >> first thank you for keeping after the federal government that is you know violating the federal privacy laws as again our citizens. i want to did i'm taking stock in all i'm hearing beco
. i don't get you. all right. thank you. and nsa -- this is something, i don't know where rick comes out, nsa hits keep oncoming, we found out a court on to nsa abuses and warning them to cool it years ago, i'm talking years ago. to republican congressman to said enough, and moving to slap them down, now. ls, and guaranteed 1-second trades. and at the center of it all is a surprisingly low price -- just $7.95. in fact, fidelity gives you lower trade commissions than schwab, td ameritrade, and etrade. i'm monica santiago of fidelity investments, and low fees and commissions are another reason serious investors are choosing fidelity. now get 200 free trades when you open an account. neil: drip, drip, stop, stop, congressman mike fitzpatrick had enough. congressman, is joining me now. what do you want to do? >> first thank you for keeping after the federal government that is you know violating the federal privacy laws as again our citizens. i want to did i'm taking stock in all i'm hearing become in our district work periods, in a lot of meetings, talking about a lot of things including
to pounce on this nsa mess to see how the heck it got messy. what we did not tell you is that it would take 60 days to find out. ♪ neil: all right. good news on this whole nsa mess. in 60 days, 60 days, we'll get to the bottom of this, 60 days. that's how long we have to wait to hear from the president's so-called surveillance panel to release initial findings, 60 days. imagine how much could happen in that time. why, look what happened in the last 60 days. on the heels the government collected 115 million americans phone records, we heard they were demanding and getting billions of e-mails from every major online site out there; then news that the nsa had 75% of all internet traffic under its watch, reports later that courts slapped the nsa more than a few times for this kind of overreach over just the last few years; then snooping on phone calls made abroad, phone calls from abroad, and nsa snoops spying on girlfriends, later explained it's just a few snoops on just a few girlfriends, and that's just in the lass 60 days. can you imagine what we'll discover in the next 60 days? the hills
neil: now we can safely say the nsa more than just kind of broke the law. try thousands of times. welcome, everybody. i'm neil cavuto. not just fine. don't take it for me. take it from despise himself. an internal audit out of no less than the national curity agency it's often define 200776 violations of established court orders regarding surveillance on americans, are targets in this country. with the nsa demands in a speech read what anyone else would call ridiculous. hundreds of cases of supposedly unintended interception of u.s. e-mail and phone calls and typographical errors that prompted overly aggressive searches. this group for one thing, not responding to them or even reporting them is quite another. it's not only sloppy but illegal and now we come to find that the smartest intelligence surveillance court that is supposed to keep an eye on them to not even learn about some of these violations until months after the fact willing among constituonal which is kind of like locking the barn door after all the animals left. my friends, step back and ponder the sheer magnitude o
. we have probably some nsa intel, some sigint, there is some sort of collaboration among these franchise groups. it m have something to do with the end of ramadan this coming week and a variety of other activities. you know, they smell some blood in the water perhaps, some weaknesses that we have demonstrated. and now, out o abundance of caution, as you indicate, neil, we are going to close things down. and i suspect, what you probably will not see, but is happening, is we're staging forward, in the ropean and african area of operations as well as central commd. we have special opering fors ready to go to the aid of some of these embassies. you won't that out until something happens. neil: wish we had done that in benghazi but that is then, this is now. what is interesting about all the reports and you guys certainly knowar more than i do you by see the name al qaeda popping up again and again and again. >> isn't that interesting. neil: i want to know your take on tha >> this is very interesting because this is an opportunity for the state department to dig themselves out
mind the question of how complicit different companies were in the nsa scandal. that is a lit je let jet matt q. but, at same time, google is doing with that data is trying to sell you stuff for the most part. what the nsa is doing is trying to find a reason to put new jail. neil: they can take leaps with that and share that with a lot of folks, that we never intended to happen. katherine thank you very much. now to lawyer who is livid. rebecca rose woodland said that by breaking into your e-mails is breaking the law. rebecca. google says no, this is a part of what you sign up for as a g-mail user, and as a g-ml receiver. >> how can a g-mail receiver sign up anything? neil: apparently, when you open that e-mail,l, you become vulnerable. >> and i knew? did you know. first of all you don't distinguish where it is from, you don't accept the terms with every e-mail does a come a question, do you accept the terms of that g-mail user's account, they don't get that, if that i want to take my information, aol users all net thrown out to every e-mail user, if they want to save it they can tou
the text, and nsa on the prowl. >> no, no, no, look, it makes sense in terms of tort law. were they to allow this if you couldn't know -- neil: you're a lawyer; right? >> i am. causation is a very real concept in tort law. listen, from a practical point of view -- neil: how about big government creeps? now, not only to the driver, but anyone communicating with that driver. >> if they know the driver's driving? neil: how do you think they know? how do you think they will know? >> two ways. one way is -- neil: give us your phone. >> thanks a lot, i don't want to hand over the phone. >> let me answer. one way is ed. we have that in situations. there's evidence. if there's no evidence, then you're not going to be spobl. evidence, and that comes out in the court. if they put you on the stand and you were the one texting, and they asked you the questions, saying, did you know that person was driving at the time you were texting to them? if you say, yes, then we know. the other way is a possibility. they may look at your phone. >> oh, my. neil: that's the first way. >> exactly. >> tha
discussed it would have been buried. i believe he was in favor of what nsa was doing this operation -- >> you sayg he knew? >> i say i find it difficult to believe as an american citizen he did not a clue at extend of what they are doing, he is our coder in chief, he is in charge. iin my mind, how many committees e worth while? >> that is what i was thinking, commissions and their work pile up largely ignored. >> you are putting james clapper in charge of investigating james clapper, he is in charge of investigatng -- >> you find that odd? >> bizarre, and i watch that press conrence, it was a great defense of obamacare, but a horrible defense of this. because, you are right. no president wants toave another 9/11 on their watch. nobody. they will go to whatever measures they will go to to prevent it from happening, i think measures a way too extreme. i'm not comfortable them. i am opposed to it. it has gone wayyoverboard, so, my attitude is, don't have another commission, you know what you are doing, you don't need t to investigate it, clappr investigating clap ser really clper is re
Search Results 0 to 23 of about 24 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (31 Dec 2014)